United Jewish Org. of Williamsburgh v. Wilson

Full title: UNITED JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS OF WILLIAMSBURGH, INC., ET AL.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Aug 23, 1974

500 F.2d 434 (2d Cir. 1974)

Opinion

No. 1251, Docket 74-2037.

Argued August 16, 1974.

Decided August 23, 1974.

Nathan Lewin, Washington, D.C. (Miller, Cassidy, Larroca Lewin, Washington, D.C., Dennis Rapps, Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

George D. Zuckerman, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of the State of New York, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees Wilson, Ghezzi, Anderson and Duryea.

Gerald W. Jones, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (David G. Trager, U.S. Atty. for the E. D. of N.Y., J. Stanley Pottinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Walter Gorman and S. Michael Scadron, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for defendant-appellee Saxbe.

Irwin L. Herzog, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the City of New York, New York City, for defendant-appellee The Board of Elections of the City of New York.

Eric Schnapper, New York City (Jack Greenberg, New York City, of counsel), for intervenors-appellees.

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Walter Bruchhausen, Judge.

Before OAKES, Circuit Judge, and FRANKEL and KELLEHER, District Judges.^_

_ Of the Southern District of New York and the Central District of California, respectively sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Having studied the papers and heard argument, the court concludes that the District Court's order 377 F.Supp. 1164 denying the motion for a preliminary injunction should be, and it is, affirmed. In the interests of the parties and of others who may be affected, this ruling is issued today. An opinion will be filed hereafter discussing this determination and finally disposing of the appeal.

It is so ordered.