From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Indus. v. Commr. of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 4, 1964
331 F.2d 605 (6th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 15448.

May 4, 1964.

John W. Piester, Detroit, Mich. (Herbert M. Weil, John W. Piester, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for petitioners.

Crombie J.D. Garrett, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, David O. Walter, Edward L. Rogers, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MILLER and CECIL, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon appellants' petition to review the decision of the Tax Court, and the Court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decision be and is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court in United Industrial Corporation and Subsidiary Companies, 21 T.C.M. 1482, T.C. Memo. 1962-280, and upon the authority of General Bancshares Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 326 F.2d 712 (C.A.8).


Summaries of

United Indus. v. Commr. of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 4, 1964
331 F.2d 605 (6th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

United Indus. v. Commr. of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:UNITED INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION and Subsidiary Companies, and United…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: May 4, 1964

Citations

331 F.2d 605 (6th Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

United States Gypsum Company v. United States

Expenses connected with stock dividends have been held nondeductible under section 162 in a number of cases.…

Affiliated Capital Corp. & Subsidiaries v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

In General Bancshares Corp. v. Commissioner, 326 F.2d 712 (8th Cir. 1964), affg. 39 T.C. 423 (1962), the…