From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

UNITED FINANCE THRIFT CORP. v. BAIN

Supreme Court of Texas
Mar 30, 1966
400 S.W.2d 302 (Tex. 1966)

Opinion

No. A-11079.

February 23, 1966. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1966.

Bailey Williams, Irion, Cain, Cocke Magee, Burt Berry, Dallas, Dean Moorhead, Austin, for petitioners.

Fritz Vinson, Dallas, for respondent.


The Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion reported in 393 S.W.2d at page 429 cited and quoted from Moore v. Savage, Tex.Civ.App., 359 S.W.2d 95 (writ ref., n. r. e. 1962), but did not take cognizance of the per curiam opinion of this Court reported in 362 S.W.2d at page 298. Similar to the situation in Moore v. Savage, here there was no objection to the definition of 'unreasonable collection efforts,' or to the special issue relating thereto, in the court's charge. See Rule 272, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.


Summaries of

UNITED FINANCE THRIFT CORP. v. BAIN

Supreme Court of Texas
Mar 30, 1966
400 S.W.2d 302 (Tex. 1966)
Case details for

UNITED FINANCE THRIFT CORP. v. BAIN

Case Details

Full title:UNITED FINANCE THRIFT CORP. et al., Petitioners, v. James BAIN, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Mar 30, 1966

Citations

400 S.W.2d 302 (Tex. 1966)

Citing Cases

Pioneer Finan Thrift v. Adams

Appellants in its objections to the charge requested the court to give the following definition of `unusual…