From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Air Lines v. St. Human Rights App. Bd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 13, 1978
61 A.D.2d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

March 13, 1978


Consolidated proceedings pursuant to section 298 Exec. of the Executive Law to review two orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated April 22, 1977 and July 6, 1977, respectively, which, inter alia, affirmed separate orders of the State Commissioner of Human Rights declaring that petitioner's policy of mandatory, unpaid pregnancy leave constituted unlawful sex discrimination in violation of section 296 Exec. of the Executive Law. Orders confirmed and petitions dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determinations under review are supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole (see Executive Law, § 298). Latham, J.P., Damiani, Gulotta, Margett and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

United Air Lines v. St. Human Rights App. Bd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 13, 1978
61 A.D.2d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

United Air Lines v. St. Human Rights App. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED AIR LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. STATE HUMAN RIGHTS APPEAL BOARD et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1978

Citations

61 A.D.2d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

In re National Airlines, Inc.

See, e.g., Burwell v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 633 F.2d 361 (4th Cir. 1980); Air Line Pilots Association et…

Burwell v. E. Air Lines, Inc.

Eastern's explanation of its new policy discloses that United, which prevailed in Condit v. United Air Lines,…