From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Union Carbide Corporation v. Train

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 10, 1976
541 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir. 1976)

Summary

setting aside and remanding guideline regulations and new source standards for the entire Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Point Source Category

Summary of this case from Natural Resources Defense Council v. Costle

Opinion

No. 74-1459.

February 10, 1976.



ORDER


We have considered the motion of the parties to remand to the Environmental Protection Agency the regulations promulgated for the Major Organic Products Segment of the Organic Chemical Manufacturing Point Source Category, 40 CFR Part 414, as promulgated in 39 Federal Register 14675 (April 25, 1974), and as subsequently amended, and for other action, including the withdrawal, reconsideration, and repromulgation of phase II Regulations for the same industry, 40 CFR Part 414, as promulgated and published in 41 Federal Register 901, 914 (January 5, 1976), and are of opinion the motion is well taken and ought to be granted.

It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that Phase I Regulations for the Major Organic Products Segment of the Organic Chemical Manufacturing Point Source Category, 40 CFR Part 414, as promulgated in 39 Federal Register 14675 (April 25, 1974), and as subsequently amended, shall be, and they hereby are, set aside and remanded to the Environmental Protection Agency for reconsideration and repromulgation.

It is further ORDERED that the Environmental Protection Agency will withdraw the Phase II Regulations for the same industry, 40 CFR Part 414, as promulgated and published in 41 Federal Register 901, 914 (January 5, 1976), as quickly as may be and will promptly reconsider and repromulgate such Phase II Regulations.

It is further ORDERED that the parties will comply with other stipulations and agreements in the motion, although not here mentioned with particularity.

It is further ORDERED that the stipulations and agreements in the motion shall be, and they hereby are, approved.

It is further ORDERED that the requirements concerning the filing of briefs in this proceeding are rescinded and the hearing previously set for February 19, 1976 is canceled.

With the concurrences of Circuit Judges RIVES and BREITENSTEIN.


Summaries of

Union Carbide Corporation v. Train

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 10, 1976
541 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir. 1976)

setting aside and remanding guideline regulations and new source standards for the entire Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Point Source Category

Summary of this case from Natural Resources Defense Council v. Costle
Case details for

Union Carbide Corporation v. Train

Case Details

Full title:UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. RUSSELL E. TRAIN, ETC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 10, 1976

Citations

541 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

Schiavone Const. Co., Inc. v. Samowitz

Thus, the Court's role is not to examine the propriety of the challenged bidding procedure de novo, but only…

Natural Resources Defense Council v. Costle

As a result of this litigation, various regulations have been set aside and remanded to EPA for…