holding that there was no interception when the police listened to a tape of a telephone conversation previously recorded by one of the parties to the conversation
Summary of this case from Fraser v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.No. 75-1636.
October 4, 1976.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 531 F. 2d 1211.
holding that there was no interception when the police listened to a tape of a telephone conversation previously recorded by one of the parties to the conversation
Summary of this case from Fraser v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.affirming district court's granting of summary judgment
Summary of this case from Fidenas AG v. Honeywell Inc.replaying a previously recorded conversation was not an "intercept"
Summary of this case from In re Matter of Thundervision, LLCreplaying a previously recorded conversation was not an "intercept"
Summary of this case from In Matter of Thundervision, LLCFull title:UNGAR et al. v. DUNKIN' DONUTS OF AMERICA, Inc., et al
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 4, 1976
Second, the defendant must have sufficient economic power in the tying market to impose significant…
Robbins Flooring, Inc. v. Federal Floors, Inc.However, in making these arguments, plaintiff has ignored the great weight of authority holding to the…