Summary
affirming maximum statutory damage award
Summary of this case from Rust v. Electrical Workers Local No. 26 PensionOpinion
Docket No. 95-3036.
January 28, 1997
Appeal from and Citation (if reported) D.S.C.
Affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Underwood v. Fluor Daniel
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 28, 1997
106 F.3d 394 (4th Cir. 1997)
Summaries of
Underwood v. Fluor Daniel
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 28, 1997
106 F.3d 394 (4th Cir. 1997)
affirming maximum statutory damage award
Summary of this case from Rust v. Electrical Workers Local No. 26 Pensionawarding the maximum penalty despite no evidence of prejudice
Summary of this case from Honey v. Dignity Health, Non-Profit Corp.discussing whether to apply a South Carolina rule requiring parties to commence an action for statutory penalties within a year
Summary of this case from FRYE v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYnoting that in South Carolina, the applicable statute of limitations for a COBRA claim under § 1132(c) would be the one-year statute of limitations for actions upon a statute for a penalty or forfeiture
Summary of this case from Phillips v. Wythe County Community HospitalIn Underwood, the court imposed the maximum penalty of $100 per day on a company that failed to provide COBRA notice, despite the fact that the plaintiff's knew about their eligibility independent of the defendant's required notice.
Summary of this case from Sluka v. Landau Uniforms, Inc.Case details for
Underwood v. Fluor Daniel
Case Details
Full title:Underwood v. Fluor Daniel, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Jan 28, 1997
Citations
106 F.3d 394 (4th Cir. 1997)
Citing Cases
Pressley v. Tupperware Long Term
Nonetheless, the district court agreed with Prudential that the one-year limitations period in South Carolina…
U.S. v. One 48 Ft. White Colored Sailboat08 incurred by her in storing, fitting and conditioning the vessel after its release pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…