From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Underhill v. Wood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1900
53 App. Div. 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)

Opinion

July Term, 1900.


Judgment affirmed, with costs to all parties, payable out of the estate.


In Washbon v. Cope ( 144 N.Y. 287, 297) Peckham, J., says that the rule is well settled that where the devise or bequest over to third persons is not dependent upon the event of death simply, but upon death without issue or without children, the death referred to is that in the lifetime of the testator. But the exception is also well recognized that the court will give effect to the language of the testator according to its natural import as referring to a death, under the circumstances mentioned, occurring either before or after the death of the testator. Such circumstances, it is said, must be cogent enough for the court reasonably to say that there is good and fair ground to apply the exception, not the rule. The question before the learned Special Term in this case was whether the rule or the "well-settled exception" applied. I am of opinion that the learned court rightly applied the exception, for the reasons stated in his opinion, and that the conclusion reached as to the capacity of the trustees to take is correct; I, therefore, think that an affirmance may rest upon that opinion without further discussion. All concurred.


Summaries of

Underhill v. Wood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1900
53 App. Div. 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
Case details for

Underhill v. Wood

Case Details

Full title:Lydia W. Underhill, as Executrix of Augusta U. Patton, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1900

Citations

53 App. Div. 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)