From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Umans v. United States

U.S.
Nov 6, 1967
389 U.S. 80 (1967)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

No. 41.

Argued October 11, 1967. Decided November 6, 1967.

368 F.2d 725, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Edward Brodsky argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was William Esbitt.

Sidney M. Glazer argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg.


The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Waterman's opinion for that court in United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Umans v. United States

U.S.
Nov 6, 1967
389 U.S. 80 (1967)
Case details for

Umans v. United States

Case Details

Full title:UMANS v . UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 6, 1967

Citations

389 U.S. 80 (1967)

Citing Cases

United States v. Dallago

Even assuming that the indictment was based in whole or in part on hearsay testimony, it need not be…

United States v. Cohen

The jury therefore might well have considered that the requisite evidence as to intent was lacking, but that…