From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uman v. Timpane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 1980
77 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

July 21, 1980


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 26, 1980, which denied their motion to dismiss the action for lack of in personam jurisdiction. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted and complaint dismissed (see Rush v. Savchuk, 444 U.S. 320; Erneta v Princeton Hosp., 49 N.Y.2d 829, revg 66 A.D.2d 669; Morehouse v Volkswagen AG., 74 A.D.2d 164). Damiani, J.P., Lazer, Gibbons and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Uman v. Timpane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 1980
77 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Uman v. Timpane

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE UMAN, an Infant, et al., Respondents, v. ALFRED T. TIMPANE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 21, 1980

Citations

77 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Knapp v. Shoemaker

Since the Supreme Court overturned Seider, a series of cases, presenting varying factual and procedural…

Kalman v. Neuman

In Gager, as in Morehouse (supra), the objection to quasi in rem jurisdiction had been timely asserted (see,…