From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ullrich v. Ullrich

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 3, 1948
62 A.2d 506 (N.J. 1948)

Opinion

Submitted May term, 1948.

Decided September 3d 1948.

On appeal from the Court of Chancery.

Mr. Samuel F. Penza, for the complainant-respondent.

Mr. Simon M. Seley ( Mr. Charles M. Grossman, of counsel), for the defendant-appellant.


Our examination of the record and consideration of the various points submitted on appeal lead us to the conclusion that the decree under review should be affirmed. The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, BURLING, JACOBS, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Ullrich v. Ullrich

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 3, 1948
62 A.2d 506 (N.J. 1948)
Case details for

Ullrich v. Ullrich

Case Details

Full title:GERTRUDE ULLRICH, complainant-respondent, v. JOSEPH ULLRICH…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 3, 1948

Citations

62 A.2d 506 (N.J. 1948)
62 A.2d 506

Citing Cases

Insurance Co. of North America v. Allied Crude Vegetable Oil Refining Corp.

Our decisions indicate that a stay of an action, like many other forms of preliminary injunction, is to be…

Crowell v. Crowell

which our courts have been concerned in such cases: Rector v. Rector, 78 N.J. Eq. 386 ( Ch. 1911); Parmly v.…