Opinion
No. 85-1295.
April 28, 1986, October TERM, 1985.
C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals to consider the question of mootness. Reported below: 771 F. 2d 424 and 778 F. 2d 553.
No. 85-1295.
April 28, 1986, October TERM, 1985.
C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals to consider the question of mootness. Reported below: 771 F. 2d 424 and 778 F. 2d 553.
remanding for consideration of mootness
Summary of this case from Dean v. Barberremanding for consideration of mootness
Summary of this case from Long v. St. Clair Cnty. Sheriff's Office & Sheriff Terry Surlesremanding for consideration of mootness
Summary of this case from McKell v. Stateremanding for consideration of mootness
Summary of this case from Zanders v. Sumter County Sheriff's Deptstating that "the assignment of cases is still a judicial function in the sense that it directly concerns the case-deciding process, and by statute it is the responsibility of the chief judge . . . in this case"
Summary of this case from TAYLOR v. RELLFull title:TYUS v. MARTINEZ
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 28, 1986
In light of Sea-First, the court granted Local 881's petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated our judgment,…
U.S. v. ReivesThis footnote contains the following alignment among the federal courts of appeal: four circuits agree that…