From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tyree v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 9, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0175 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 9, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0175.

April 9, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2007, upon consideration of the report of the magistrate judge (Doc. 8), recommending that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be granted and that plaintiff's claim under the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act ("the Act") be dismissed, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 552, 552a, to which plaintiff filed an objection (Doc. 10), and, following an independent review of the record, it appearing that the Federal Bureau of Prison's sentence computation sheet is exempt from the Act's requirements, see Thomas v. Aschroft, No. 3:CV-05-0090, 2006 WL 860136, at *4 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2006) (noting that the Federal Bureau of Prison's Inmate Central Record System documents are exempt from the the Act's requirements); see also 28 C.F.R. § 16.97(j) (implementing a rule exempting the Inmate Central Record System documents from the requirements of 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(1), (5)), it is hereby ORDERED that:

Plaintiff concurs in the dismissal of his claim against defendant Warden Cameron Lindsay. (See Doc. 10 at 5); see also Chocallo v. Bureau of Hearings and Appeals, 548 F.Supp. 1349, 1369 (E.D. Pa 1982) (stating that the Act creates a remedy for inaccurate records only against the appropriate agency, not the individual employees of the agency).

See 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(5) (requiring that "[e]ach agency that maintains a system of records shall . . . maintain all records which are used by the agency by the agency in making any determination about any individual with such accuracy . . . as is reasonably necessary to assure fairness to the individual").

1. The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 8) is ADOPTED.
2. The application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 6) is GRANTED.
3. The complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
4. Leave to amend is DENIED as futile. See Grayson v. Mayview State Hosp., 293 F.3d 103, 108 (3d Cir. 2002).
5. Any appeal from this order is DEEMED frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case.


Summaries of

Tyree v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 9, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0175 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 9, 2007)
Case details for

Tyree v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:WARDELL L. TYREE, Plaintiff v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 9, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07-CV-0175 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 9, 2007)