Opinion
December 21, 1999
Order and ensuing judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, Jr., J.), entered November 20, 1997 and March 10, 1998, respectively, which, inter alia, granted the CPLR 3211(a) motion of defendant Paccar Financial Corp. and dismissed the complaint against defendants Paccar Financial Corp. and TJMT Transportation Services, Inc., and order, same court and Justice, entered May 29, 1998, which granted the motion of defendant Robert Medina to vacate his default and for leave to file a late answer, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Steve S. Efron for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Robert D. Becker for Defendant-Respondent.
Barry Siskin for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Robert D. Becker for Defendants-Respondents.
SULLIVAN, J.P., ROSENBERGER, NARDELLI, WILLIAMS, FRIEDMAN, JJ.
In this personal injury action, the motion court, in dismissing the complaint against defendants Paccar Financial and TJMT, properly found that the settlement agreement entered into between those parties and plaintiff in a prior action predicated on the same causes as are asserted herein barred the instant attempt at relitigating those causes. Contrary to plaintiff's argument, the prior settlement is enforceable since it was in substantial compliance with the requirements of CPLR 2104 (see, Rhulen Agency, Inc. v. Gramercy Brokerage, Inc., 106 A.D.2d 725, 728; Langlois v. Langlois, 5 A.D.2d 75). Moreover, where, as here, defendants relied on the settlement to their detriment, plaintiff is equitably estopped from avoiding it (see, Hallock v. State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 232).
The court also properly vacated the default of defendant Medina in light of his showing of a justifiable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see, Cipriano v. Hank, 197 A.D.2d 295, 297).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.