Tuscaloosa County Comm. v. Cosby

Full title: Tuscaloosa County Commission, E.E. "Billy" Tinsley, in both his individual…

Court: Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Date published: May 28, 1999

796 So. 2d 1099 (Ala. Civ. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 2980094.

Decided May 28, 1999. Rehearing Denied September 10, 1999.

Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit Court (CV-95-565).

Michael D. Smith of Hubbard, Smith, McIlwain, Brakefield Browder, P.C., Tuscaloosa, for appellant.

Richard H. Holston of Brooks Hamby, P.C., Mobile, for appellee.

MONROE, Judge.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala.R.App.P.; Tuscaloosa County v. Henderson, 699 So.2d 1274 (Ala.Civ.App. 1997);Tuscaloosa County v. Teaster, 770 So.2d 598 (Ala.Civ.App. 1999); and White v. Searcy, 634 So.2d 577 (Ala.Civ.App. 1994).

Robertson, P.J., and Yates, and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Crawley, J., dissents.

CRAWLEY, Judge, dissenting.

I conclude that the county and Tinsley are entitled to discretionary function immunity. See Tuscaloosa County v. Teaster, 770 So.2d 598 (Ala.Civ.App. 1999) (Crawley, J., dissenting); and Tuscaloosa County v. Henderson, 699 So.2d 1274 (Ala.Civ.App. 1997).