From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turturro v. Agusta Aerospace Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 13, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2894 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 13, 2010)

Summary

commenting that "the doctrine of derivative jurisdiction is alive and well in this circuit"

Summary of this case from Dellinger v. Richards

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2894.

August 13, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2010, upon consideration of Motion to Dismiss of United States of America (Doc. No. 3) and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and all claims against Third Party Defendant United States of America are DISMISSED.
2. This matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Turturro v. Agusta Aerospace Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 13, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2894 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 13, 2010)

commenting that "the doctrine of derivative jurisdiction is alive and well in this circuit"

Summary of this case from Dellinger v. Richards

noting that FTCA "vests exclusive jurisdiction in the federal district courts over civil claims for damages arising out of negligent acts of federal employees acting within the scope of their employment"

Summary of this case from Ray v. Allocco
Case details for

Turturro v. Agusta Aerospace Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH TURTURRO, as Administrator of the Estate of Adam Braddock, Deceased…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 13, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2894 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 13, 2010)

Citing Cases

Ray v. Allocco

That abrogation, however, did not extend to cases removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1442, which allows removal where…

Turturro v. United States

The procedural history of these cases is complex. For an outline of the numerous lawsuits that have been…