holding that Simmons is only applicable where the state argues future dangerousness and the defendant is legally ineligible for parole
Summary of this case from Wheat v. JohnsonNo. 94-1524.
May 15, 1995, October TERM, 1994.
Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 264 Ga. 812, 450 S. E. 2d 421.
holding that Simmons is only applicable where the state argues future dangerousness and the defendant is legally ineligible for parole
Summary of this case from Wheat v. Johnsonholding travel from New York to Puerto Rico insufficient to create a "special or unusual burden"
Summary of this case from MEDIA3 Technologies, LLC v. Mail Abuse Prevention Systemfinding that the burden was not satisfied simply in the need to travel from New York to Puerto Rico
Summary of this case from Hasbro, Inc. v. Clue Computing, Inc.Full title:TURNER ET AL. v. GILES
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 15, 1995
The plaintiff must identify other employees to whom he is similarly situated "in terms of performance,…
Workgroup Technology Corp. v. MGM Grand Hotel, LLCThird, the exercise of jurisdiction must, in light of the Gestalt factors, be reasonable. Pritzker v. Yari,…