From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tunnel IP, LLC v. AAMP of Fla.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 27, 2022
8:22-cv-1009-KKM-JSS (M.D. Fla. Jul. 27, 2022)

Opinion

8:22-cv-1009-KKM-JSS

07-27-2022

TUNNEL IP LLC, Plaintiffs, v. AAMP OF FLORIDA, Defendant.


ORDER

Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, United States District Judge.

Plaintiffs notified the Court that the parties settled this case. (Doc. 13.) Accordingly, the Court orders that this case is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 3.09(b). Within 60 days of this order, the parties may submit a stipulated judgment or move to reopen the action. See id.', FED. R. ClV. P. 59(e), 60(b). After that 60-day period, dismissal shall be with prejudice. The Court declines to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, as the parties have not identified a compelling “factual or legal basis to [do so].” Goldsby v. Renosol Seating, LLC, 294 F.R.D. 649, 654 (S.D. Ala. 2013). The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines and to close this case.

ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tunnel IP, LLC v. AAMP of Fla.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 27, 2022
8:22-cv-1009-KKM-JSS (M.D. Fla. Jul. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Tunnel IP, LLC v. AAMP of Fla.

Case Details

Full title:TUNNEL IP LLC, Plaintiffs, v. AAMP OF FLORIDA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jul 27, 2022

Citations

8:22-cv-1009-KKM-JSS (M.D. Fla. Jul. 27, 2022)