From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Pernell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1975
50 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

December 31, 1975


In an action for a declaration as to which of the defendant insurers is obligated to defend a certain claim, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 29, 1975, as (1) denied appellants' motion for summary judgment and (2) consolidated this action with a certain pending negligence action. Order modified by deleting therefrom the provisions consolidating the two actions and substituting therefor a provision that the two actions shall be tried jointly. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements to respondents. In our opinion, the interests of all of the parties will best be served by a joint trial. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tucker v. Pernell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1975
50 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Tucker v. Pernell

Case Details

Full title:DANNIE TUCKER et al., Respondents, v. NATHANIEL PERNELL et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1975

Citations

50 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Kelley v. Galina-Bouquet Inc.

She should have the opportunity to prove both, if the facts so warrant. However, in the exercise of our…