Summary
In Tucker v. Norris, 2009 WL 5066761 (E.D.Ark. 2009), an Arkansas inmate alleged that the Board violated his constitutional rights by denying his release on parole and doing so pursuant to an unconstitutional procedure. He specifically alleged that the governing state statutes and Board regulations created a liberty interest in parole.
Summary of this case from Howell v. StraughnOpinion
NO. 5:08-CV-00276-BSM-BD.
December 16, 2009
ORDER
The court has received the recommended disposition from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the recommended disposition, the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this court's findings in all respects in its entirety.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED