Opinion
(4063)
Argued May 6, 1986 —
Decision released June 3, 1986
Action, in two counts, to recover damages for the allegedly fraudulent electric utility rates charged by the defendant, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford and tried to the jury before M. Hennessey, J.; verdict for the defendant on count one and directed verdict for the defendant on count two; thereafter, the court rendered judgment for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court. No error.
The appellant filed a motion for reargument which was denied.
Stanley V. Tucker, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).
John C. Bullock, for the appellee (defendant).
This case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for the defendant on the first count, and the court directed a verdict for the defendant on the second count. The plaintiff did not move to set aside the verdicts thereby limiting our review to the standard of plain error. Practice Book 3063; Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, 185 Conn. 510, 513-16, 441 A.2d 163 (1981); Eagar v. Barron, 2 Conn. App. 468, 472, 480 A.2d 576 (1984).
Our review of the record, transcripts and briefs submitted in this case and our analysis of only those claims of error raised by the plaintiff that are properly before us fail to indicate that the trial court committed plain error with regard to any such claims.