Opinion
23-1522
04-05-2024
GUYLAIN CIBAKA TSHIZUBU, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.
Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Nancy Friedman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Gregory A. Pennington, Jr., Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: February 1, 2024
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
ON BRIEF:
Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner.
Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Nancy Friedman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Gregory A. Pennington, Jr., Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before THACKER and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Guylain Cibaka Tshizubu, a native and citizen of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge's denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and Tshizubu's claims and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see Herrera-Alcala v. Garland, 39 F.4th 233, 245 (4th Cir. 2022) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Tshizubu (B.I.A. Apr. 14, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED