From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trustmark Ins. Co. v. Barragan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2018
Case No. CV 17-7326 FMO (SKx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-7326 FMO (SKx)

01-30-2018

TRUSTMARK INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-in-Interpleader, v. RAFAEL R. BARRAGAN and AZUCENA B. VALERIO, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's Order Re: Pending Motion, filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment, IT IS ADJUDGED that:

1. Trustmark shall be awarded its reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action, in the total amount of $6,143.13 in attorney's fees and $969.25 in costs. The Clerk shall release this amount to counsel for Trustmark from the interpleaded funds.

2. The Clerk shall release the remaining interpleaded funds, plus any interest, to Azucena B. Valerio, less any statutory or applicable fees or costs.

3. Rafael R. Barragan and Azucena B. Valerio shall be enjoined from instituting or maintaining any additional action against Trustmark for recovery of the Disputed Funds in any other federal court.

4. The above-captioned case is dismissed with prejudice.

5. Plaintiff shall serve Rafael R. Barragan and Azucena B. Valerio with a copy of this judgment in such a manner as to make it operative in any future proceeding. Dated this 30th day of January, 2018.

/s/_________

Fernando M. Olguin

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Trustmark Ins. Co. v. Barragan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2018
Case No. CV 17-7326 FMO (SKx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Trustmark Ins. Co. v. Barragan

Case Details

Full title:TRUSTMARK INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-in-Interpleader, v. RAFAEL R…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 17-7326 FMO (SKx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2018)

Citing Cases

QBE Specialty Ins. Co. v. Kane

This court is persuaded that QBE will face irreparable harm if claimants are able to initiate or continue…

Pruco Life Ins. Co. v. Cal. Energy Dev.

See also, e.g., Coates, 2013 WL 556800, at *7-8 (issuing an injunction in an interpleader action pursuant to…