From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TruePosition, Inc. v. LM Ericsson Tel. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 11-4574 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-4574

03-06-2012

TRUEPOSITION, INC., Plaintiff, v. LM ERICSSON TELEPHONE COMPANY (TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON), QUALCOMM, INC., ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC., EUROPEAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS INSTITUTE, and THIRD GENERATION PARTNERSHIP PROJECT a/k/a 3GPP Defendants.


ORDER

AND NOW this 6th day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the Motion for Protective Order filed by European Telecommunications Standards Institute ("ETSI"), the response in opposition by Plaintiff, Trueposition, Inc. ("Trueposition"), and ESTI's reply, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. the Motion (Doc. No. 89) is DENIED;

2. ETSI's request for an oral argument is DENIED; and

3. the jurisdictional discovery between Trueposition and ETSI shall be conducted pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

BY THE COURT

_____________

ROBERT F. KELLY

SENIOR JUDGE


Summaries of

TruePosition, Inc. v. LM Ericsson Tel. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 11-4574 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 6, 2012)
Case details for

TruePosition, Inc. v. LM Ericsson Tel. Co.

Case Details

Full title:TRUEPOSITION, INC., Plaintiff, v. LM ERICSSON TELEPHONE COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 6, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-4574 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 6, 2012)

Citing Cases

Walters v. Flint (In re Flint Water Cases)

The burden is on the proponent of applying the optional procedures of the Hague Convention to persuade the…

Phx. Process Equip. Co. v. Capital Equip. & Trading Corp.

(7) The good faith of the party resisting discovery.Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd., 183 F. Supp. 3d 409, 419-20…