From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trs. of the Pavers & Rd. Builders Dist. Council Welfare, Pension, & Annuity Funds v. U.S. Roofing Co. Corp.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 28, 2023
1:22-CV-5053 (FB) (PK) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-CV-5053 (FB) (PK)

09-28-2023

TRUSTEES OF THE PAVERS AND ROAD BUILDERS DISTRICT COUNCIL WELFARE, PENSION, AND ANNUITY FUNDS and TRUSTEES OF THE LOCAL 1010 APPRENTICESHIP, SKILL IMPROVEMENT AND TRAINING FUND, Plaintiffs, v. USA ROOFING COMPANY CORP., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FREDERIC BLOCK, Senior United States District Judge

On September 12, 2023, Magistrate Judge Kuo issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court grant Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, and Annuity Funds and Trustees of the Local 1010 Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement and Training Funds' (“Plaintiffs”) motion for default judgment against USA Roofing Company Corp. (“Defendant”), and award Plaintiffs $382,923.66 in damages plus post-judgment interest. The R&R gave the parties fourteen days to file objections and warned that “[f]ailure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal any order or judgment entered based on this Report and Recommendation.” R&R at 21. No objections have been filed.

If clear notice has been given of the consequences of failing to object, and there are no objections, the Court may adopt the R&R without de novo review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); Smith v. Campbell, 782 F.3d 93, 102 (2d Cir. 2015) (“Where parties receive clear notice of the consequences, failure to timely object to a magistrate's report and recommendation operates as a waiver of further judicial review of the magistrate's decision.” (citations omitted)). The Court will, however, excuse the failure to object and conduct de novo review if it appears that the magistrate judge may have committed plain error. See Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000).

No error, plain or otherwise, appears on the face of the R&R. Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R without de novo review. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant, and shall award Plaintiffs the following damages: $95,989.34 in delinquent contributions and union assessments for months with remittance reports; $217,603.48 in delinquent contributions and union assessments for months without remittance reports; $33,825.22 in interest through September 5, 2023, and interest at a rate of $82.41 per day from September 6, 2023 through the date of judgment; $30,087.53 in liquidated damages; $80.34 in late payment interest; $5,337.75 in attorneys' fees and expenses; and post-judgment interest calculated at the statutory rate. In total, $382,923.66 in damages, plus additional interest as indicated above.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Trs. of the Pavers & Rd. Builders Dist. Council Welfare, Pension, & Annuity Funds v. U.S. Roofing Co. Corp.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 28, 2023
1:22-CV-5053 (FB) (PK) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Trs. of the Pavers & Rd. Builders Dist. Council Welfare, Pension, & Annuity Funds v. U.S. Roofing Co. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TRUSTEES OF THE PAVERS AND ROAD BUILDERS DISTRICT COUNCIL WELFARE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Sep 28, 2023

Citations

1:22-CV-5053 (FB) (PK) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2023)

Citing Cases

Trs. of the Pavers & Rd. Builders Dist. Council Welfare, Pension, & Annuity Funds v. Site Fencing, Inc.

) The Court has reviewed these reports and finds them to be reasonable and accurate. Trs. of Pavers & Rd.…