From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trouten v. Autozone, Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 24, 2004
471 Mich. 879 (Mich. 2004)

Opinion

No. 124380.

September 24, 2004.


SC: 124380, COA: 232690.

Summary Disposition.

In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Corley v. Detroit Bd of Ed, 470 Mich 274 (2004). MCR 7.302(G)(1).

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ. We would deny leave to appeal.

WEAVER, J. I would deny leave to appeal and allow this case to proceed to trial on the claim of quid pro quo sexual harassment in relation to the acts allegedly committed by the defendant's store manager, William Hall. I do not find that the facts herein are related to the facts in Corley v. Detroit Bd of Ed, 470 Mich 274 (2004). In Corley, supra, we dealt with the question of quid pro quo sexual harassment where the parties had been involved in a prior consensual, romantic relationship. The complainant in this case has not alleged that any mutual romantic relationship ever existed.


Summaries of

Trouten v. Autozone, Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 24, 2004
471 Mich. 879 (Mich. 2004)
Case details for

Trouten v. Autozone, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TROUTEN v. AUTOZONE, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Sep 24, 2004

Citations

471 Mich. 879 (Mich. 2004)
686 N.W.2d 487