From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trimmer v. Van Bomel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 16, 1976
51 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

March 16, 1976


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 23, 1975, denying defendant's motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and without prejudice to renewal thereof after the conclusion of pretrial procedures herein. We do not pass upon the merits of plaintiff's claims or defendant's position with respect thereto at this time, except to the extent that we agree with Special Term that the present record contains issues of fact which cannot now be summarily resolved. Defendant's reliance on plaintiff's deposition in support of her motion is premature since that deposition has not yet been submitted to plaintiff for signature and, hence, is still subject to change. Moreover, plaintiff has not had the opportunity to depose the defendant in this most unusual litigation.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Kupferman, Silverman, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.


Summaries of

Trimmer v. Van Bomel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 16, 1976
51 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Trimmer v. Van Bomel

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD W. TRIMMER, Respondent, v. CATHARINE B. VAN BOMEL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Trimmer v. Van Bomel

Defendant has moved for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 contending that the action is without merit…