From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trevino v. State

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
May 2, 2012
NO. PD-1304-11 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 2, 2012)

Opinion

NO. PD-1304-11

05-02-2012

RICHARD NIETO TREVINO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS


ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

BELL COUNTY

KELLER , P.J., delivered the opinion of the unanimous Court.

Appellant was convicted of indecency with a child. On appeal, he complained that the trial judge erred by including in the jury charge a definition of female genitalia. He contended that the definition was a comment on the weight of the evidence. The court of appeals affirmed, concluding that the definition was not a comment on the weight of the evidence. After the court of appeals had issued its decision, we handed down Kirsch v. State, which held that defining the word "operate" in a DWI prosecution constituted an impermissible comment on the weight of the evidence.Because the court of appeals did not have the benefit of our opinion in Kirsch, we vacate the court of appeals's decision and remand the case to that court for reconsideration in light of Kirsch. Do not publish

Trevino v. State, No. 07-11-00027-CR, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 5777 (Tex. App.-Amarillo July 27, 2011) (not designated for publication).

357 S.W.3d 645 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012).

Id. at 649-52.
--------


Summaries of

Trevino v. State

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
May 2, 2012
NO. PD-1304-11 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Trevino v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD NIETO TREVINO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: May 2, 2012

Citations

NO. PD-1304-11 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 2, 2012)