Opinion
April 27, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Isseks, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, with costs, the application is denied, the defendant Isidro Gutierrez's affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction is dismissed, and the complaint is reinstated as against him.
On September 22, 1982, the parties were involved in a motor vehicle accident. At that time, the defendant Isidro Gutierrez presented his driver's license to a State Trooper, which license set forth an address from which he had moved over four months prior thereto.
The plaintiff's process server, after several visits to the address noted on the driver's license, affixed the summons and complaint to the door of the premises and, thereafter, a copy of the papers were mailed to that address.
We find that the respondent's presentment at the scene of the accident of a driver's license with an incorrect address constituted an affirmative act of misrepresentation and was in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 505 (5). Based upon that act, the respondent is estopped from contesting the validity of the service of process upon him at the address noted on his license and the due diligence of the plaintiff in ascertaining his correct actual dwelling place or usual place of abode (see, Hill v Jones, 113 A.D.2d 874; Kramer v Ryder Truck Rental, 112 A.D.2d 194). Therefore, the service of process was proper, and the respondent's affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction should have been dismissed. Lawrence, J.P., Weinstein, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.