Summary
In Ramilo, a district court applied § 1154(c) (1986) to a petition filed after the amendment's November 10, 1986 enactment, based on marriage fraud that occurred on June 20, 1985.
Summary of this case from Wehbi v. RiddleOpinion
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
Editorial Note:
This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding.
Before REINHARDT, TROTT, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Barbara Treadwell appeals pro se the district court's entry of summary judgment on Treadwell's action alleging that her union breached its duty of fair representation and that her former employer breached a collective bargaining agreement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, see Conkle v. Jeong, 73 F.3d 909, 915 (9th Cir.1995), and we affirm.
Because Treadwell fails to adduce evidence that her union acted arbitrarily, discriminatorily, or in bad faith, thus violating its duty of fair representation, her contention that the district court erred by entering summary judgment lacks merit. See id.
Appellee Todd Pacific Shipyards' request to strike Treadwell's Excerpts of Record is denied. Appellee Todd Pacific Shipyards' request to strike Treadwell's Supplemental Appendix is granted.
AFFIRMED.