From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Travelers Insurance Co. v. De Bothuri

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 27, 1985
465 So. 2d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Summary

In Travelers Insurance Co. v. De Bothuri, 465 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) —one of the seminal cases on this question—a woman whose property was stolen sued the insured for negligence, id. at 662–63.

Summary of this case from Thomas Mach. v. Everest Nat'l Ins. Co.

Opinion

Nos. 84-1130, 84-2272.

March 27, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, R. William Rutter, Jr., J.

Amy N. Dean of Steven R. Berger, P.A., Miami, and Law Offices of Adams, Coogler, Watson Merkle, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ricci Roberts, P.A., and Larry Klein and Jane Kreusler-Walsh of Klein Beranek, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee, P.L.A., Inc.


This is an appeal from a final summary judgment in favor of the insured against the insurance company in a declaratory judgment action to determine coverage. Appellee sued appellant's insured for negligence resulting in theft of her personal property. Appellant subsequently filed a declaratory action seeking to determine if theft was covered by its policy under its definition of property damage. The policy in question provides:

"Property damage" means (1) physical injury to or destruction of tangible property which occurs during the policy period, including the loss of use thereof at any time resulting therefrom, or (2) loss of use of tangible property which has not been physically injured or destroyed providing such loss of use is caused by an occurrence during the policy period.

The trial court found that theft was covered by the policy. At oral argument both parties agreed that the coverage for the theft arises only out of the second definition of property damage, to-wit:

(2) loss of use of tangible property which has not been physically injured or destroyed providing such loss of use is caused by an occurrence during the policy period.

Accordingly, with that clarification, the trial court's order on the issue of coverage is affirmed. See United States Fidelity Guaranty Company v. Mayor's Jewelers of Pompano, Inc., 384 So.2d 256 (Fla.4th DCA 1980).

HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Travelers Insurance Co. v. De Bothuri

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 27, 1985
465 So. 2d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

In Travelers Insurance Co. v. De Bothuri, 465 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) —one of the seminal cases on this question—a woman whose property was stolen sued the insured for negligence, id. at 662–63.

Summary of this case from Thomas Mach. v. Everest Nat'l Ins. Co.
Case details for

Travelers Insurance Co. v. De Bothuri

Case Details

Full title:TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. ELAINE DE BOTHURI AND P.L.A.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 27, 1985

Citations

465 So. 2d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Thomas Mach. v. Everest Nat'l Ins. Co.

And, as we'll see, the parties in our case haven't excluded theft from their definition of "property damage."…

First Newton Nat. Bank v. Gen. Cas. Co.

"Continental Casualty Co. v. Gilbane Bldg. Co., 391 Mass. 143, 147-48, 461 N.E.2d 209, 212-13 (1984)…