From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Transit Auth

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 31, 1980
102 Misc. 2d 846 (N.Y. App. Term 1980)

Opinion

January 31, 1980

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, ANNE G. FELDMAN, J.

Friedman Shafton, P.C. (Michael E. Greene of counsel), for appellant.

Helen R. Cassidy and Glenn L. Sabele for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed, without costs.

In this personal injury matter, the claimant fell to the ground as she was walking to the front of a New York City Transit Authority bus to board it. She was three to six feet away from the door when she caught the heel of her shoe in broken pavement and suffered injuries to her foot and shoulder. The matter was submitted to compulsory arbitration pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 675 Ins. of the Insurance Law. The arbitrator found that claimant was a "covered person" under the "no-fault" provisions of the Insurance Law. The Transit Authority moved to vacate the award and the court below granted that application.

The scope of judicial review of an arbitrator's award in a compulsory arbitration is broader than that standard of review utilized in a voluntary arbitration (Mount St. Mary's Hosp. of Niagara Falls v Catherwood, 26 N.Y.2d 493, 508; Caso v Coffey, 41 N.Y.2d 153, 158; Matter of Furstenberg [Aetna Cas. Sur. Co.], 67 A.D.2d 580). Applying this broader standard of review to the case at bar the court below properly vacated the award on the ground that the arbitrator's decision lacked a rational basis. "A pedestrian cannot be converted into a user [of a motor vehicle] by virtue of the close proximity to his vehicle. Intention to use is not synonymous with use" (Thomas v Travelers Ins. Co., 87 Misc.2d 136, 139, affd 54 A.D.2d 608; see, also, Matter of Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth. [Gholson], 71 A.D.2d 1004). The claimant was not a pedestrian injured through the "use or operation" of a motor vehicle as defined in subdivision 10 of section 671 Ins. of the Insurance Law and thus, is not a "covered person" under the statute.

Concur: PINO, P.J., and HIRSCH, J.; WEINSTEIN, J. taking no part.


Summaries of

Transit Auth

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 31, 1980
102 Misc. 2d 846 (N.Y. App. Term 1980)
Case details for

Transit Auth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jan 31, 1980

Citations

102 Misc. 2d 846 (N.Y. App. Term 1980)
428 N.Y.S.2d 131

Citing Cases

Fox v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.

The Insurance Company cites several cases from the courts of New York which refused to find coverage based on…