enforcing federal requirement that states pay mandatory state supplement to social security recipients as a condition of continued participation in Title XIX
Summary of this case from Roe v. CaseyNo. 74-511.
March 31, 1975, October TERM, 1974.
C.A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would grant certiorari. Reported below: 508 F. 2d 485.
enforcing federal requirement that states pay mandatory state supplement to social security recipients as a condition of continued participation in Title XIX
Summary of this case from Roe v. Caseyregarding termination of welfare benefits provided through the program of Aid to the Aged, Blind, and Disabled, 42 U.S.C. § 1381-85
Summary of this case from Walsh v. McGeenoting that because there is a “human tendency” to assume that governmental action is correct, “many of the mistakes that will inevitably be made will stand uncorrected”
Summary of this case from Hudson v. BowlingFull title:TRAINOR, ACTING DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID OF ILLINOIS v. VARGAS
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 31, 1975
Unfortunately, this court has had occasion to become familiar with the history of this controversy. In the…
Doston v. Duffy16. IDPA's policy of deleting noncooperative caretaker relatives from grants at the time it generates the DPA…