From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TRAG v. FRANK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1985
110 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 1, 1985

Appeal from the Family Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.).


Order reversed, in the exercise of discretion, with costs, petition reinstated, and petitioner is hereby directed to serve upon respondent's counsel and file with the Family Court, Suffolk County, her sworn answers to respondent's interrogatories within 30 days after service upon her of a copy of the order to be made hereon with notice of entry.

Based upon a review of the record, we conclude that the Family Court erred in dismissing the petition due to petitioner's failure to answer interrogatories within the time period provided for. The best interest of the children, which is of paramount concern in support proceedings, can only be served by permitting petitioner additional time within which to file her sworn answers. Titone, J.P., Thompson, O'Connor and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

TRAG v. FRANK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1985
110 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

TRAG v. FRANK

Case Details

Full title:JOYCE TRAG, Appellant, v. ROBERT W. FRANK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Solly M. v. Audrey S.

(See Robinson v. Aspinall, 238 AD2d 255 [1st Dept 1997] citing Matter of Discenza v. Dann OO., 148 AD2d 196…

Solly M. v. Audrey S.

( See Robinson v. Aspinall, 238 A.D.2d 255, 657 N.Y.S.2d 15 [1st Dept. 1997] citing Matter of Discenza v.…