From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trachtenberg v. Fuerstenberg

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Nov 7, 1945
327 Ill. App. 215 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,392. (Abstract of Decisions.)

Opinion filed November 7, 1945 Rehearing denied November 26, 1945 Released for publication November 27, 1945

FORMER ADJUDICATION, § 47res judicata as not applicable when there is no identity of parties. In action for accounting, wherein defense raised was that doctrine of res judicata applied because issues in proceedings to discover assets in probate court were identical and were decided in favor of defendants, it appearing that there were additional parties defending, and same parties defending in different capacities, than in probate proceedings, held that there was no identity of parties and doctrine of res judicata was not applicable as bar to plaintiff's action.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. DONALD S. McKINLAY, Judge, presiding.

Reversed and remanded. Heard in the third division, first district, this court at the June term, 1945.

Bernard J. Brown, for appellant;

Lee D. Mathias, for appellees.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed November 7, 1945; rehearing denied November 26, 1945; released for publication November 27, 1945.


Summaries of

Trachtenberg v. Fuerstenberg

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Nov 7, 1945
327 Ill. App. 215 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)
Case details for

Trachtenberg v. Fuerstenberg

Case Details

Full title:Clara Trachtenberg, Appellant, v. Harold B. Fuerstenberg et al., Appellees

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District

Date published: Nov 7, 1945

Citations

327 Ill. App. 215 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)
63 N.E.2d 673

Citing Cases

Smith v. Estate of Womack

In an action for accounting, wherein defense raised was that doctrine of res judicata applied because issues…