From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Town of Hempstead v. Lizza Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1996
232 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 28, 1996.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated October 17, 1995, as, upon renewal, adhered to its original determination granting the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and denying the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Before: Mangano, J.P., O'Brien, Pizzuto, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see, CPLR 3212 [b]). The affidavit prepared by the defendant's engineering expert Robert Samson failed to address the plaintiffs cause of action sounding in breach of contract. We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

Town of Hempstead v. Lizza Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1996
232 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Town of Hempstead v. Lizza Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD, Respondent, v. LIZZA INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant. (And…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 988

Citing Cases

82-90 Broadway Realty Corp. v. N.Y. Supermarket, Inc.

The plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of…