In Eagle v. Franklin, 71 Ark. 544, 75 S.W. 1093, Judge RIDDICK, speaking for the court, said: "To entitle one to have partition of lands, he must not only have title, but must have possession, either actual or constructive, of the lands which he asks to have partitioned."
Summary of this case from Phillips v. First Nat. Bk. of Van BurenNo. 03-1037.
November 24, 2004.
Unpublished opinion. Affirmed.
In Eagle v. Franklin, 71 Ark. 544, 75 S.W. 1093, Judge RIDDICK, speaking for the court, said: "To entitle one to have partition of lands, he must not only have title, but must have possession, either actual or constructive, of the lands which he asks to have partitioned."
Summary of this case from Phillips v. First Nat. Bk. of Van BurenFull title:TOWN OF EAGLE v. FRANKLIN-STIGLITZ
Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Date published: Nov 24, 2004
" The doctrine of these cases was adhered to in Head v. Phillips, 70 Ark. 432, 62 S.W. 878; Eagle v.…
Simmons v. TurnerThe doctrine above announced has been established by a long line of decisions of this court. Byers v. Danley,…