From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Town of Brookhaven v. Ronkoma Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1989
154 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

October 30, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant is the owner of the Ronkonkoma Inn, a structure designated as a multiple residence facility pursuant to Town of Brookhaven Code § 30-180. Town of Brookhaven Code § 30-140 (B) (formerly § 30-183 [A]) provides that the owner of such a facility must, on an annual basis, obtain a permit from the Division of Fire Prevention to operate the facility. To obtain the necessary permit, however, the owner of a multiple residence facility must submit to a physical inspection of the premises (Town of Brookhaven Code § 30-11 [B]) by the Chief Fire Marshal or by any marshal of the Division of Fire Prevention (Town of Brookhaven Code § 30-7). Thus, pursuant to the above provisions, to obtain the necessary permit the owner of a multiple residence facility must submit to a compulsory physical inspection. Violators are subject to fines of up to $500 and imprisonment for up to six months for each day their facility is permitted to operate without a town permit (Town of Brookhaven Code § 30-16 [A]). The defendant has allegedly operated its facility since January of 1987 without obtaining a permit. The Town of Brookhaven commenced the instant action to compel compliance with the aforementioned sections of the Town of Brookhaven Code. The Supreme Court awarded summary judgment to the defendant, holding unconstitutional those sections of the Town of Brookhaven Code which require a warrantless inspection of the premises. We affirm.

Contrary to the contention of the Town of Brookhaven, the instant case falls squarely within the holding of Sokolov v Village of Freeport ( 52 N.Y.2d 341). As in that case, the ordinance at bar compels the owner of residential rental property to submit to a warrantless search. However, in so doing, the ordinance violates a property owner's right to be free from unreasonable searches as guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution (see, Camara v Municipal Ct., 387 U.S. 523; See v City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541). Accordingly, the Town of Brookhaven may not compel the defendant to submit to a warrantless physical inspection of its premises, nor may it penalize the defendant for failing to comply with the permit requirements of the Town Code. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Kunzeman and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Town of Brookhaven v. Ronkoma Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1989
154 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Town of Brookhaven v. Ronkoma Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN, Appellant, v. RONKOMA REALTY CORP., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1989

Citations

154 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Conviro Assoc. v. City of Glen Cove

"While this presumption is rebuttable, unconstitutionality must be demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt and…

Wisoff v. City of Schenectady

“It is well established that the 4th Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extends…