From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tourneau v. Tishman & Lipp

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Feb 15, 1954
211 F.2d 240 (2d Cir. 1954)

Opinion

No. 186, Docket 22909.

Argued February 3, 1954.

Decided February 15, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Vincent L. Leibell, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for the defendant in their action for infringement of a design patent and for unfair competition.

Harry C. Bierman, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Sidney G. Faber, New York City (Ostrolenk Faber and Samuel Ostrolenk, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before CLARK, FRANK and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.


We are content to affirm on the fully reasoned opinion of District Judge Leibell, 119 F. Supp. 593, holding invalid Design Patent No. Des. 161,296 for "Combined Watchcase and Bracelet" issued to the individual plaintiff on December 19, 1950, and declining to find defendant guilty of unfair competition with plaintiffs in the sale of watchcases and bracelets. If the new patent code, 35 U.S.C. § 103, July 19, 1952, is applicable, the result, we believe, must remain the same.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Tourneau v. Tishman & Lipp

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Feb 15, 1954
211 F.2d 240 (2d Cir. 1954)
Case details for

Tourneau v. Tishman & Lipp

Case Details

Full title:Henry K. TOURNEAU and Tourneau, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TISHMAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Feb 15, 1954

Citations

211 F.2d 240 (2d Cir. 1954)

Citing Cases

Trojan Textile Corp. v. Crown Fabrics Corp.

         It is clear that the requirement of invention for design patents is as high as it is for mechanical…

Falcon Industries v. R.S. Herbert Co.

"To obtain a valid design patent is exceedingly difficult." The same view is stated in Tourneau v. Tishman,…