From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tougher v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 4, 1971
441 F.2d 1148 (9th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 24348.

May 4, 1971.

H. Thomas Kay, Jr. (argued), of Henshaw, Conroy Hamilton, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellants.

Elmer J. Kelsey (argued), Lee A. Jackson, Edward Lee Rogers, Leonard J. Henzke, Jr., Attys., Tax Division, Richard M. Hahn, Acting Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before KOELSCH, CARTER and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.


In reporting income for the years 1963 and 1964, Taxpayers, Michael A. Tougher, Jr. and Amelia L. Tougher, his wife, deducted from gross income the cost of supplies — principally groceries — purchased by Mrs. Tougher for family use from the Federal Aviation Administration Commissary on Wake Island, where Mr. Tougher was then employed by the F.A.A. as an electronic technician.

The Commissioner disallowed these deductions and determined deficiencies in the Toughers' income taxes resulting from these adjustments. The Tax Court, concluding that the deductions did not fall within the purview of Section 119 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 ( 26 U.S.C. § 119), as contended by the Toughers, sustained the Commissioner's determinations. Michael A. Tougher, Jr. and Amelia L. Tougher v. C.I.R., 51 T.C. 737 (1969). The Toughers brought the matter here on petition to review the decision of the Tax Court.

We affirm on the rationale of the Tax Court.


Summaries of

Tougher v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 4, 1971
441 F.2d 1148 (9th Cir. 1971)
Case details for

Tougher v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Michael A. TOUGHER, Jr., and Amelia L. Tougher, Appellants, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 4, 1971

Citations

441 F.2d 1148 (9th Cir. 1971)

Citing Cases

Jacob v. United States

Also, the Commissioner argues that the term "meals," as used in § 119, should be given its plain and ordinary…

Ghastin v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

There was no issue before the Sixth Circuit as to the meaning of the term ‘meals' as used in sec. 119. See…