From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Touche Ross Co. v. Congregation of Passion

U.S.
Oct 17, 1994
513 U.S. 947 (1994)

Summary

holding the economic loss rule inapplicable to claims of accountant malpractice

Summary of this case from Steiner Corp. v. Johnson & Higgins of Cal.

Opinion

No. 94-341.

October 17, 1994.


Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 159 Ill. 2d 137, 636 N. E. 2d 503.


Summaries of

Touche Ross Co. v. Congregation of Passion

U.S.
Oct 17, 1994
513 U.S. 947 (1994)

holding the economic loss rule inapplicable to claims of accountant malpractice

Summary of this case from Steiner Corp. v. Johnson & Higgins of Cal.

finding where allegations of illegal conduct of public employers have only minimal effect on the efficiency of the office the balance weighs in favor of the speech

Summary of this case from Sexton v. Martin

refusing to dismiss official capacity claims for declaratory and injunctive relief

Summary of this case from Bock Associates v. Chronister
Case details for

Touche Ross Co. v. Congregation of Passion

Case Details

Full title:TOUCHE ROSS CO. v. CONGREGATION OF PASSION, HOLY CROSS PROVINCE

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 17, 1994

Citations

513 U.S. 947 (1994)

Citing Cases

Padilla v. Perez

A claim has been fairly presented if the petitioner has described the operative facts and legal theory upon…

Gonzalez v. Kernan

A claim has been fairly presented if the petitioner has described the operative facts and legal theory upon…