From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Totten v. Totten

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Apr 23, 1926
137 A. 916 (Md. 1926)

Opinion

Decided April 23rd, 1926.

Divorce — Adultery — Evidence.

The burden of proof is on one alleging adultery as a ground for divorce, and the evidence should be clear, satisfactory and convincing.

Decided April 23rd, 1926.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, In Equity (PRESTON, J.).

Bill by Priscilla Stearns Totten against Howe Totten, to which defendant filed a cross-bill. From a decree for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

The cause was argued before BOND, C.J., PATTISON, URNER, ADKINS, OFFUTT, DIGGES, PARKE, and WALSH, JJ.

Elmer J. Cook and Edgar Allan Poe, for the appellant.

George Weems Williams and Edward H. Burke, for the appellee.


Unreported cases.


Summaries of

Totten v. Totten

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Apr 23, 1926
137 A. 916 (Md. 1926)
Case details for

Totten v. Totten

Case Details

Full title:HOWE TOTTEN v . PRISCILLA STEARNS TOTTEN

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Apr 23, 1926

Citations

137 A. 916 (Md. 1926)
137 A. 916

Citing Cases

Simmont v. Simmont

Nor was there anything unreasonable in his request. For, while the evidence was not sufficient, under the…

Kremis v. Kremis

Excluding that evidence, the questions in the case are (1) whether the evidence remaining was sufficient to…