From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toscano v. Lindt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 1985
112 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 22, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.).


Appeal dismissed as moot, without costs or disbursements.

On January 10, 1984 the harness racing license of George Regan was suspended by the New York State Racing Wagering Board for 45 days, through February 23, 1984. Two days later, horses formerly trained by Regan which had been entered in races by petitioner Toscano were scratched by the board because she had been an employee of Regan up until the time of the suspension, and the order suspending his license also prevented his employees from entering horses he had trained. Toscano brought this proceeding under CPLR article 78 to prohibit the board from barring her from entering horses, which petition was granted. Regan's suspension ended on February 23, 1984. As the scratching of Toscano's entries was to take place only during the period of George Regan's suspension and since his period of suspension has expired, a decision on this appeal will not affect directly the rights of the parties; thus the issue is moot ( Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707; New York Public Interest Research Group v. Regan, 91 A.D.2d 774). This case does not present a question that would warrant an exception to the mootness doctrine. Brown, J.P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Toscano v. Lindt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 1985
112 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Toscano v. Lindt

Case Details

Full title:LINDA TOSCANO, Respondent, v. JOHN VAN LINDT et al., Constituting the New…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 22, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of Gansburg v. Gansburg

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as moot, without costs or disbursements. Since the order of protection…

Matter of Faculty Ass'n v. Pub. Emp. Rel. Bd.

We now affirm. The retroactive effect of the successor agreement and the Association's insistence that it…