From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tortoriello v. Toohey

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 22, 1939
8 A.2d 291 (N.J. 1939)

Opinion

Argued May 24, 1939 —

Decided September 22, 1939.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 121 N.J.L. 604.

For the appellants, Emil Neblo.

For the respondent, William J. Egan ( Stephen J. Lorenz, of counsel).


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 11.

For reversal — PERSKIE, J. 1.


Summaries of

Tortoriello v. Toohey

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 22, 1939
8 A.2d 291 (N.J. 1939)
Case details for

Tortoriello v. Toohey

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL TORTORIELLO ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. JOHN J. TOOHEY, COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 22, 1939

Citations

8 A.2d 291 (N.J. 1939)
8 A.2d 291

Citing Cases

Banks v. Toohey

Decided April 25, 1940.Held, that section 3 of chapter 198, Pamph. L. 1938, in providing that petitions for…

Williams v. Newark Dept. of Welfare

The Division has no jurisdiction to declare an award "paid" because the employee owes the employer a sum,…