holding that "an adverse employment action . . . [sufficient to support a retaliation claim is] a materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of employment"
Summary of this case from Neratko v. FrankNo. 97-578.
December 1, 1997
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 116 F. 3d 625.
holding that "an adverse employment action . . . [sufficient to support a retaliation claim is] a materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of employment"
Summary of this case from Neratko v. Frankdenying absolute immunity for prosecutor who swore out a false certificate of probable cause, thus crossing the line between advocacy and participation
Summary of this case from Davis v. Zirkelbachnoting that the same standards for evaluating hostile environment claims are the same whether the alleged discrimination is based on race or sex
Summary of this case from Young v. Rogers Wellsnoting that "claims brought under New York State's Human Rights Law are analytically identical to claims brought under Title VII"
Summary of this case from Simmons v. New York City Health Hospital Corporationnoting that "claims brought under New York State's Human Rights Law are analytically identical to claims brought under Title VII"
Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. New York City Housing AuthorityFull title:TORRES v. PISANO ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 1, 1997
However, the common law rule does not use `aided' is such a broad sense.");see also Torres v. Pisano, 116…
Gallagher v. DelaneyWhat is, is not always what is right, and reasonable people can take justifiable offense at comments that the…