Opinion
Argued March 5, 1889
Decided March 19, 1889
Eugene H. Lewis for appellant.
William W. Badger for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except EARL and DANFORTH, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Torbett v. Eaton
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1889
113 N.Y. 623 (N.Y. 1889)
Summaries of
Torbett v. Eaton
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1889
113 N.Y. 623 (N.Y. 1889)
Case details for
Torbett v. Eaton
Case Details
Full title:RUTH TORBETT, Respondent, v . SHERBURNE B. EATON, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 19, 1889
Citations
113 N.Y. 623 (N.Y. 1889)
22 N.Y. St. Rptr. 992
Citing Cases
Huntington v. Attrill
(Laws 1848, chap. 40, § 15.) It is seen that such provision is substantially like that first above mentioned,…
Huntington v. AttrillThe court held that the liability was not one arising upon contract, but one imposed upon Attrill as a…