From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Top Notch, Inc. v. Augusta Properties Ltd.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 2, 1980
246 Ga. 467 (Ga. 1980)

Summary

distinguishing voluntariness analysis under Jackson-Denno from custodial-interrogation analysis under Miranda

Summary of this case from Reid v. State

Opinion

36607.

SUBMITTED AUGUST 22, 1980.

DECIDED OCTOBER 2, 1980.

Complaint for injunction, etc.; cancellation. Richmond Superior Court. Before Judge Pierce.

Kenneth R. Chance, Ben Swain McElmurray, Jr., for appellants.

Patrick J. Rice, David B. Bell, for appellee.


Judgment affirmed without opinion pursuant to Rule 59.

All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED AUGUST 22, 1980 — DECIDED OCTOBER 2, 1980.


Summaries of

Top Notch, Inc. v. Augusta Properties Ltd.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 2, 1980
246 Ga. 467 (Ga. 1980)

distinguishing voluntariness analysis under Jackson-Denno from custodial-interrogation analysis under Miranda

Summary of this case from Reid v. State
Case details for

Top Notch, Inc. v. Augusta Properties Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:TOP NOTCH, INC. et al. v. AUGUSTA PROPERTIES LTD

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Oct 2, 1980

Citations

246 Ga. 467 (Ga. 1980)
271 S.E.2d 862

Citing Cases

Davenport v. State

At some point thereafter, it appears that we more frequently began conducting sua sponte review of the…

White v. State

No such question is presented in this case: There is no evidence whatsoever in the record and no offer of…