From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tomlinson v. Rutland

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 19, 1964
327 F.2d 668 (5th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 20542.

February 19, 1964.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, William A. McRae, Jr., Judge.

James H. Walsh, Asst. U.S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Edith House, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Harry Baum, Timothy Dyk, Attys., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

S.E. Simmons, St. Petersburg, Fla., for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and JONES, Circuit Judges.

Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.


The facts here presented are different only in detail from those in Commissioner v. Birch Ranch and Oil Co., 9th Cir. 1951, 192 F.2d 924, affirming Birch Ranch and Oil Co. v. Commissioner, 13 T.C. 930. The principles there stated are sound and require the affirmance of the district court.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Tomlinson v. Rutland

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 19, 1964
327 F.2d 668 (5th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Tomlinson v. Rutland

Case Details

Full title:Laurie W. TOMLINSON, District Director of Internal Revenue, Appellant, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 19, 1964

Citations

327 F.2d 668 (5th Cir. 1964)