From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tomasini v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Mar 6, 1888
75 Cal. 225 (Cal. 1888)

Opinion

         Certiorari to superior court, Del Norte county; JAMES E. MURPHY, Judge.

         Department Two

         Application for a writ of certiorari.

         COUNSEL:

         L. F. Cooper, and Sawyer & Burnett, for Petitioners.


         OPINION

         THE COURT          Writ of certiorari to review orders of respondent appointing an attorney to vote for an absent creditor at the election of an assignee in an insolvent proceeding, and appointing as assignee the person chosen at such election.

         If the petitioners were aggrieved at all by the action of the respondents, it was by the order confirming the election, and appointing the person selected assignee. But the court had jurisdiction of the proceeding; and the orders complained of, even if erroneous, cannot be reviewed on this writ. The prayer of the petitioner is denied and the writ dismissed.


Summaries of

Tomasini v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California
Mar 6, 1888
75 Cal. 225 (Cal. 1888)
Case details for

Tomasini v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS TOMASINI et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF DEL NORTE COUNTY…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 6, 1888

Citations

75 Cal. 225 (Cal. 1888)
17 P. 1

Citing Cases

Washington v. Tennessee

Aggrieved by these events and circumstances, Plaintiff asks the Court to award him monetary damages and…

Walls v. Fisher

Thereafter, Petitioner filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief that was later amended by…