From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toiyabe Supply Co. v. Arcade

Supreme Court of Nevada
Oct 6, 1958
330 P.2d 121 (Nev. 1958)

Opinion

No. 4082

October 6, 1958.

Appeal from the Fifth Judicial District Court, Mineral County; John F. Sexton, Presiding Judge.

Guild, Busey and Guild and Howard L. Cunningham, of Reno, for Appellants.


OPINION


Arcade Dress Shops, Inc. obtained a judgment against Toiyabe Supply Company and B.E. O'Malia and Gladys Hosang for damages for the conversion of certain store fixtures. Hosang did not appeal and the judgment stands as against her. Appellants contend that the record does not support a judgment against them. They represent that they are the owners and lessors of the premises in which the fixtures were used (most of which were movable fixtures not affixed to the building) and insist that the record is bare of any evidence showing any conversion by them other than the mere fact that they were the owners of the real estate. Further, they represent that the record demonstrates that at the time of trial Hosang claimed title to the fixtures and admitted that they were then in her possession.

Respondent Arcade Dress Shops, Inc., owner of the fixtures, filed no answering brief, and we heretofore entered an order to the effect that it had waived its right to argue the case. Rules of the Supreme Court, XI (3).

Under these circumstances this court may, in its discretion, regard the default of the respondent as a confession of error, and reverse the judgment as to the appellants without consideration of the merits of the appeal. Hartford Mining Co. v. Home Lumber Coal Co., 61 Nev. 1, 107 P.2d 128, 114 P.2d 1091. In our view this is an appropriate case for such method of disposition.

Judgment reversed as to these appellants.


Summaries of

Toiyabe Supply Co. v. Arcade

Supreme Court of Nevada
Oct 6, 1958
330 P.2d 121 (Nev. 1958)
Case details for

Toiyabe Supply Co. v. Arcade

Case Details

Full title:TOIYABE SUPPLY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND B.E. O'MALIA, APPELLANTS, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Oct 6, 1958

Citations

330 P.2d 121 (Nev. 1958)
330 P.2d 121

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Such a failure may, in the discretion of this court, be treated as a confession of error and result in the…

State of Rhode Island v. Prins

See NRAP 31(a). Appellant has moved this court to treat respondent's failure to timely file his brief as a…